There have been many stories on the issue of voter suppression and the like. I haven't had time to read and write on them all, but I've been collecting links to them so that I can in the future. I've decided to go ahead and post them here for anyone who comes along. I'll probably be writing on them in the future.
It's 1-day til ELECTION DAY!! I've already voted, and I hope everyone has either done the same, or is prepared to vote tomorrow! I'm going to be up at 4:30am tomorrow to head out to the polling places to hand out fliers to remind people to vote No on Prop 8. Then it's to work for a few hours, and off to the local Democratic party election night. Let's all have a blast as we usher in a new era of change and government!
Go Obama!! And Go No on Prop 8!!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/us/politics/09voting.html?_r=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-k-wilson/john-mccains-terrorist-co_b_133326.html
http://www.miamiherald.com/692/story/727604.html
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9116465&source=NLT_AM&nlid=1
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/10/mccain_campaign_calls_for_inve.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/13/obama.bradley.effect/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/GOP_voter_purge_declared_illegal_in_1013.html
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6503
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93R8IE00&show_article=1
http://wvgazette.com/News/200810180380
http://www.utne.com/2008-10-28/Politics/Mounting-Evidence-of-Voter-Suppression-for-Election-Day-2008.aspx?blogid=30
Monday, November 3, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Company hired to mail absentee ballots in CO, fails to mail them
Sequoia Voting Systems admitted it never mailed over 11,000 absentee ballots to voters in Denver, and lied to elections officials about mailing them.
Read the full story at www.afterdowningstreet.org. Their story also includes many links to other great articles dealing with Republican voter fraud and attempts to steal this election.
Read the full story at www.afterdowningstreet.org. Their story also includes many links to other great articles dealing with Republican voter fraud and attempts to steal this election.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
CNN Report on ACORN
CNN had a good report on ACORN. They state very clearly that ACORN doesn't register voters, they only help voters fill out their registration forms. The government registers the voters. They also include a good breakdown of how many of the 1.3 million registrations were new, change of addresses, and invalid or fraudulent.
It's clear that the whole ACORN fluff blown up by McCain and the Republicans was clearly much ado about nothing. One still begs to wonder, why they blew it up so big.
Also check out TPM's report on ACORN.
Link to CNN Video
It's clear that the whole ACORN fluff blown up by McCain and the Republicans was clearly much ado about nothing. One still begs to wonder, why they blew it up so big.
Also check out TPM's report on ACORN.
Link to CNN Video
Crown Point Indiana GOP Dirty Tricks
The GOP in Lake County is trying to not just stop people from voting, but insisting that those who already voted at early voting centers have their votes "discarded." The GOP lawyers are claiming that these early voting centers are unfair, illegal, and could lead to voter fraud. The problem? The early voting centers are located in heavily Democratic districts.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Newly registered Ohio voter? You have a 1 in 3 chance of being stricken from the voter rolls!
According to an AP article I found on Breitbart, 1 in 3 newly registered Ohio voters are having the registrations reviewed and possibly revoked due to inconsistencies between registration information and DMV or social security information. 666,000 people have registered since January. That means potentially 222,000 people could find out on election day that they can't vote.
Aside from the obvious issue of disenfranchising 222,000 people, there's more than just a number here. That 222,000 people most likely has a large slant towards newly registered Democrats--a product of Obama's aggressive voter registration strategy. I couldn't find a break-down of the number of Democratic registrations versus Republicans, but it's safe to say that since this action is being brought forth by the Republican party, they wouldn't be looking to disenfranchise 222,000 of their own voters.
So let's do the math. Ohio has around 11 million residents. Let's estimate about 60% of those are registered and going to vote. That's 6.8 million people. The latest poll has Obama at 48.8%, and McCain at 46%. That puts 3,324,199 votes in Obama's column and 3,133,466 votes for McCain. If you subtract 222,000 votes from Obama, he ends up with 3,102,199. A loss to McCain by 30,000 votes, and a contested election by either campaign.
Even if only 60% of those 222,000 people were going to vote for Obama, that still takes Obama's victory margin down to around 140,000. Still an incredibly close race, and in the range of recounts and contesting of results.
This is where ACORN comes in to play. The Republican's will pull in the whispers of voter fraud by ACORN, and claim any victory by Obama is illegitimate. The Republican's will look to polarize the nation against Obama, much like what Bush faced before 9/11.
Aside from the obvious issue of disenfranchising 222,000 people, there's more than just a number here. That 222,000 people most likely has a large slant towards newly registered Democrats--a product of Obama's aggressive voter registration strategy. I couldn't find a break-down of the number of Democratic registrations versus Republicans, but it's safe to say that since this action is being brought forth by the Republican party, they wouldn't be looking to disenfranchise 222,000 of their own voters.
So let's do the math. Ohio has around 11 million residents. Let's estimate about 60% of those are registered and going to vote. That's 6.8 million people. The latest poll has Obama at 48.8%, and McCain at 46%. That puts 3,324,199 votes in Obama's column and 3,133,466 votes for McCain. If you subtract 222,000 votes from Obama, he ends up with 3,102,199. A loss to McCain by 30,000 votes, and a contested election by either campaign.
Even if only 60% of those 222,000 people were going to vote for Obama, that still takes Obama's victory margin down to around 140,000. Still an incredibly close race, and in the range of recounts and contesting of results.
This is where ACORN comes in to play. The Republican's will pull in the whispers of voter fraud by ACORN, and claim any victory by Obama is illegitimate. The Republican's will look to polarize the nation against Obama, much like what Bush faced before 9/11.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Vote flipping in West Virginia
Never too soon to start, early voters have begun complaining that the electronic voting machines being used in West Virginia are flipping votes from Obama to McCain, from Democrat to Republican. This has been reported in two counties so far. Jeff Waybright, Jackson County Clerk stated, "people make mistakes more than machines." Brian Wood, the Putnam county clerk, when asked about the voting irregularities said, "voting machines are very reliable. I hate the fact that stories like this are printed. It makes everybody get scared."
Well, yes Jeff and Brian. People do make mistakes, and we don't want people to be scared to vote. But really? We shouldn't print stories on voting machines not working correctly? Not even if just to warn people to make sure their votes are correct?
Remember, voting machines are supposed to have a maximum error rate of 0.0002% to be certified. The article from the Charleston Gazette noted 6 individuals who had issues out of about 1000 early voters. That's a 0.006% error rate. "The reaction time [on the machines] may be different. And when you hit the screen a second time, it cancels your vote," Wood said. Yet shouldn't mistakes made by people using the voting machines still count towards the overall error rate? Isn't poor usability a factor in errors?
Says Wood: "The best way to solve this whole problem is that before you leave the voting booth, make sure on the review screen that everybody you want to vote for is checked."
Great advice. Always check the review screen of your e-voting machine before submitting your vote.
The potential problem here though is when 30,000 people show up to vote in Putnam county on election day, and half the people have to call over a clueless poll worker to help them because their vote for Obama keeps going to McCain. Won't that lead to A) long lines, B) needing to extend voting hours or turn away people, C) people complaining of vote fraud, or D) people just submitting their incorrect votes out of confusion or not realizing what was going on? AKA, voter fraud and suppression?
UPDATE:
MSNBC reports on this today. West Virginia's Secretary of State to hold press conference on this tonight.
Well, yes Jeff and Brian. People do make mistakes, and we don't want people to be scared to vote. But really? We shouldn't print stories on voting machines not working correctly? Not even if just to warn people to make sure their votes are correct?
Remember, voting machines are supposed to have a maximum error rate of 0.0002% to be certified. The article from the Charleston Gazette noted 6 individuals who had issues out of about 1000 early voters. That's a 0.006% error rate. "The reaction time [on the machines] may be different. And when you hit the screen a second time, it cancels your vote," Wood said. Yet shouldn't mistakes made by people using the voting machines still count towards the overall error rate? Isn't poor usability a factor in errors?
Says Wood: "The best way to solve this whole problem is that before you leave the voting booth, make sure on the review screen that everybody you want to vote for is checked."
Great advice. Always check the review screen of your e-voting machine before submitting your vote.
The potential problem here though is when 30,000 people show up to vote in Putnam county on election day, and half the people have to call over a clueless poll worker to help them because their vote for Obama keeps going to McCain. Won't that lead to A) long lines, B) needing to extend voting hours or turn away people, C) people complaining of vote fraud, or D) people just submitting their incorrect votes out of confusion or not realizing what was going on? AKA, voter fraud and suppression?
UPDATE:
MSNBC reports on this today. West Virginia's Secretary of State to hold press conference on this tonight.
Friday, October 10, 2008
The mask of ACORN! Hiding the real Republican agenda...
If you don't know what ACORN is yet, you haven't been paying attention to the MSM. ACORN is a group that works to register lower-income people to vote. They are coming under flak from right-wing groups who are scared that they could soon lose their red state strongholds. ACORN is being investigated in states including Nevada, Wisconsin, North Carolina, New Mexico, Michigan, Ohio and Missouri, for fraudulent registrations. Read that: SWING STATES.
In Bridgeport Connecticut, they are looking at voter registrations submitted by ACORN because they have found invalid or fraudulent information on 10 out of 8000 registrations submitted. Now I'm not a mathematician, but I believe that's about a 0.1% error rate. Compare that to the maximum error rate allowed by voting machines (0.0002%), and it's pretty high. But I know out of the 10 or so times I've had to re-register after moving, I've messed up once or twice. So that means my personal error rate is at a 0.1% - 0.2%.
In Nevada, ACORNs offices were raided by agents for the Republican led Secretary of State and Attorney General, alleging ACORN was using convicted felons in their voter registration drive, and citing 300 apparently fraudulent registrations out of 80,000. Again, this is a 0.3% error rate.
Why is this issue important? Because it's being used as a smoke screen by the Republican party to legitimize their efforts to disenfranchise voters. They now have a flag to wave when contesting election results. They now have an excuse to hide their true actions behind.
ACORN is being mentioned at Republican rallies, where people are informed about ACORNs actions of "fraudulent" voter registration. Why bring this up at a rally? Well, if you're an underhanded Republican who is actively seeking to disenfranchise voters, even average Republicans will disavow your actions. Average Republican voters are still decent American's, and they won't go for underhanded voter fraud.
But if you give them some reason to support what you're doing, like pretending that the actions of ACORN will "steal" this election from Republicans, and so you MUST support their actions to ensure a "fair" election, you have a better chance of getting away with it. So now they are trying to tie ACORN to Obama so they can more ably protest election results, and put the true outcome of this election in question.
This isn't to say that ACORN is free from blame. They need to reevaluate their techniques for gathering registrations. Some former employees have revealed that they had fraudulently filled out apps in order to meet their quota and not be put on probation or let go. But in response to the Nevada raid, "ACORN officials said they were stunned by the search because they had unilaterally identified and flagged suspicious voter registration cards to the county elections board starting in July and had been cooperating with authorities to cull bad information and fire workers who collected that information, said Brian Mellor, senior counsel for Project Vote."
In Bridgeport Connecticut, they are looking at voter registrations submitted by ACORN because they have found invalid or fraudulent information on 10 out of 8000 registrations submitted. Now I'm not a mathematician, but I believe that's about a 0.1% error rate. Compare that to the maximum error rate allowed by voting machines (0.0002%), and it's pretty high. But I know out of the 10 or so times I've had to re-register after moving, I've messed up once or twice. So that means my personal error rate is at a 0.1% - 0.2%.
In Nevada, ACORNs offices were raided by agents for the Republican led Secretary of State and Attorney General, alleging ACORN was using convicted felons in their voter registration drive, and citing 300 apparently fraudulent registrations out of 80,000. Again, this is a 0.3% error rate.
Why is this issue important? Because it's being used as a smoke screen by the Republican party to legitimize their efforts to disenfranchise voters. They now have a flag to wave when contesting election results. They now have an excuse to hide their true actions behind.
ACORN is being mentioned at Republican rallies, where people are informed about ACORNs actions of "fraudulent" voter registration. Why bring this up at a rally? Well, if you're an underhanded Republican who is actively seeking to disenfranchise voters, even average Republicans will disavow your actions. Average Republican voters are still decent American's, and they won't go for underhanded voter fraud.
But if you give them some reason to support what you're doing, like pretending that the actions of ACORN will "steal" this election from Republicans, and so you MUST support their actions to ensure a "fair" election, you have a better chance of getting away with it. So now they are trying to tie ACORN to Obama so they can more ably protest election results, and put the true outcome of this election in question.
This isn't to say that ACORN is free from blame. They need to reevaluate their techniques for gathering registrations. Some former employees have revealed that they had fraudulently filled out apps in order to meet their quota and not be put on probation or let go. But in response to the Nevada raid, "ACORN officials said they were stunned by the search because they had unilaterally identified and flagged suspicious voter registration cards to the county elections board starting in July and had been cooperating with authorities to cull bad information and fire workers who collected that information, said Brian Mellor, senior counsel for Project Vote."
Source:
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-hasen/the-purge-surgewhy-the-go_b_133786.html
- http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/10/mccain_campaign_calls_for_inve.html
- http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/07/acorn_nevada_offices_raided.html
- http://www.courant.com/news/local/statewire/hc-09180536.apds.m0342.bc-ct--voteoct09,0,6354551.story
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
More dirty tricks
ABC News reports that someone has been putting up anonymous flyers around Drexel University in Philadelphia warning people that undercover police will be staking out the polls, looking for people with outstanding warrants. They're posted by an "Obama Supporter," trying to be helpful.. Right....
In other corners of the internet, Ernest Partridge at The Smirking Chimp website has a really good synopsis of what's at stake. It puts the pieces together and draws the same conclusions about what COULD happen if this race is close. Check it out!
And finally, NBC has a story about the apparent illegal purges of voter rolls in the swing states. Seems states are trying to follow their interpretation of the Help America Vote Act, which like every major policy from the Bush Administration, does exactly the opposite of it's title. Read the report.
In other corners of the internet, Ernest Partridge at The Smirking Chimp website has a really good synopsis of what's at stake. It puts the pieces together and draws the same conclusions about what COULD happen if this race is close. Check it out!
And finally, NBC has a story about the apparent illegal purges of voter rolls in the swing states. Seems states are trying to follow their interpretation of the Help America Vote Act, which like every major policy from the Bush Administration, does exactly the opposite of it's title. Read the report.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Brennan Center II: Bad Ballot Design
After reading the Voter Purging report, I found myself on a page describing badly designed ballots. There are ballots in 12 Ohio counties that have split the Presidential contest over two columns. Past elections have shown this type of ballot increases the number of non-votes from 1.1% to 12%. This is caused by confusion by the voter thinking that they are two separate contests and double-voting (thereby disqualifying their vote). Remember Florida?
From the report: "Hundreds of thousands of voters have been disenfranchised in recent elections due to badly designed ballots and confusing voting instructions—particularly elderly, low-income and new voters."
Considering the number of new voters that Obama is bringing in to this election, how much will this affect his vote in this highly contested state? When you're trying to steal an election, every vote counts!
From the report: "Hundreds of thousands of voters have been disenfranchised in recent elections due to badly designed ballots and confusing voting instructions—particularly elderly, low-income and new voters."
Considering the number of new voters that Obama is bringing in to this election, how much will this affect his vote in this highly contested state? When you're trying to steal an election, every vote counts!
Brennan Center for Justice Report: VOTER PURGING
Thanks to Brad Blog for their post on voter purging and a link to Brennan Center. The center has released a report on voter purging practices and pitfalls. It's an interesting read to see the different flawed practices used for purging the rights of voters in favor of making sure those who are no longer qualified to vote can't. It would be great if we had numbers on these things. Something like the number of voters purged, and the percentage of those voters who were valid and tried to vote.
Brad also brings up another piece to this, that being:
Republicans are out with phony "reports" and lawsuits damned near every day --- and not just on Fox "News" --- declaring "evidence" of completely non-existant "voter fraud" by "Democrats". Yet, in the meantime, the Dems continue to bring a knife to a gunfight, and, as we've noted many times of late (most recently here and here) seem to have no clue that they are in a War on Democracy being waged by their GOP opponenents.
Where the hell are the Democrats, and why aren't they raising holy hell about all of this stuff everywhere. Instead, all we get when we inquire is the same old John Kerry/DNC line, "We'll have thousands of lawyers on call on Election Day, should anything go wrong, blah, blah, blah."
So to tally the score, so far we're at this: The Republicans are purging voters from rolls across the country and in particular the swing states. They are spreading rumors of voter registration fraud by Democrats as a way to cover-up or legitimize their vote purging and caging. Democrats are doing very little in most cases to combat this.
And let's not forget about E-voting machines and how easily they steal our votes for whomever can hack their easily penetrable systems, and ill-conceived tracking methods.
Brad also brings up another piece to this, that being:
Republicans are out with phony "reports" and lawsuits damned near every day --- and not just on Fox "News" --- declaring "evidence" of completely non-existant "voter fraud" by "Democrats". Yet, in the meantime, the Dems continue to bring a knife to a gunfight, and, as we've noted many times of late (most recently here and here) seem to have no clue that they are in a War on Democracy being waged by their GOP opponenents.
Where the hell are the Democrats, and why aren't they raising holy hell about all of this stuff everywhere. Instead, all we get when we inquire is the same old John Kerry/DNC line, "We'll have thousands of lawyers on call on Election Day, should anything go wrong, blah, blah, blah."
So to tally the score, so far we're at this: The Republicans are purging voters from rolls across the country and in particular the swing states. They are spreading rumors of voter registration fraud by Democrats as a way to cover-up or legitimize their vote purging and caging. Democrats are doing very little in most cases to combat this.
And let's not forget about E-voting machines and how easily they steal our votes for whomever can hack their easily penetrable systems, and ill-conceived tracking methods.
CBS Report on voter purging in swing states
CBS News is reporting on voter purges going on. At least somewhere in the MSM this is being reported.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Voter Purging: A Legal Way for Republicans to Swing Elections?
The Department of Justice's Voting Section is pressuring 10 states to purge voter rolls before the 2008 election based on statistics that former Voting Section attorneys and other experts say are flawed and do not confirm that those states have more voter registrations than eligible voters, as the department alleges.
10 states receiving Voting Section purge letters are Iowa, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Vermont. Since 2005, the Section has also sued six other states or cities -- Indiana, Maine, New Jersey, Philadelphia and Pulaski County, Arkansas -- where purging voter rolls was part of the resulting settlement. Only Missouri fought a Voting Section suit, winning in federal court, although that decision has been appealed.
10 states receiving Voting Section purge letters are Iowa, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Vermont. Since 2005, the Section has also sued six other states or cities -- Indiana, Maine, New Jersey, Philadelphia and Pulaski County, Arkansas -- where purging voter rolls was part of the resulting settlement. Only Missouri fought a Voting Section suit, winning in federal court, although that decision has been appealed.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
RFK Jr: Votes are being stolen
Check out this transcript from the Ring of Fire radioshow on Air America. It's hosted by Robert F Kennedy Jr. and Mike Papantonio.
"[Help America Vote Act] institutionalized a series of impediments that make it very difficult for democrats to register, for democrats to vote and then for democrats to have their vote counted."
"“For example, if I registered as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and yet my motor vehicle license said Robert Frances Kennedy Jr. I’d be removed from the rolls. If your initial is different, if you leave an initial out, if you leave a “Jr.” out, if you leave a hyphen out in your name. And what they’ve done is a study in New York that said 80% of the errors are errors that were done by state clerks who are taking down this information. And particularly immigrant communities that people tend to vote democratic, people have names…spell Muhammad with an “o” instead of a “u”"
"[Help America Vote Act] institutionalized a series of impediments that make it very difficult for democrats to register, for democrats to vote and then for democrats to have their vote counted."
"“For example, if I registered as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and yet my motor vehicle license said Robert Frances Kennedy Jr. I’d be removed from the rolls. If your initial is different, if you leave an initial out, if you leave a “Jr.” out, if you leave a hyphen out in your name. And what they’ve done is a study in New York that said 80% of the errors are errors that were done by state clerks who are taking down this information. And particularly immigrant communities that people tend to vote democratic, people have names…spell Muhammad with an “o” instead of a “u”"
Sunday, September 21, 2008
E-Voting Problems
Looks like we're possibly going to face more issues with e-voting this year. This is another issue which could bring McCain closer to the victory line. Most of these polling problems will take place in areas that are largely Democratic. Remember Florida in 2000?
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
A Possible Narrative
So just over the last few days I've been reading up on McCain's political plays looking for acts that are bordering the criminal, or at the least down-right dirty politics. While there are MANY examples right now, in the thick of the McCain/Palin lies, I'm choosing to try to be a little more "conservative" in what information I post here.
What I am slowly seeing in just the few days since I started is a narrative, and possible scenarios that will bring McCain a victory in November. This is purely hypothetical conjecture at this point, so it will be interestingly scary to see how on-point this is.
Here's what I see happening. The Republicans will use voter suppression techniques in contested states to try to knock out as many Democratic votes as possible. This is because of the fact that there are more Democratic voters registered, and that (despite the Palin bump), Republicans aren't all that enthused about McCain and their party right now.
Voter suppression isn't enough. If the polls show Obama in a constant lead over McCain, and then McCain wins the election, voters won't buy it. There will be mass protests and calls for recounts and lawsuits filed to hold off certifying the vote.
The Republican's can't just steal the election. They've got to give the appearance that it was a hard-fought, close contest, and their candidate won.
The mud-slinging, the lies, and the Republican rumor mill that gave us such great hits as, "Obama is a secret Muslim," and "Obama refuses to recite the pledge of allegiance," aim to take off some undecided and easily gullible voters. And Palin, of course, looking to swipe some of the women voters. But that won't be enough to give them the win. They still need to resort to thier bordering-on-illegal tactics.
Oh, and just to scare you.. I thought this was a scary scenario if we shoot the tube and end up in an electoral tie!!
What I am slowly seeing in just the few days since I started is a narrative, and possible scenarios that will bring McCain a victory in November. This is purely hypothetical conjecture at this point, so it will be interestingly scary to see how on-point this is.
Here's what I see happening. The Republicans will use voter suppression techniques in contested states to try to knock out as many Democratic votes as possible. This is because of the fact that there are more Democratic voters registered, and that (despite the Palin bump), Republicans aren't all that enthused about McCain and their party right now.
Voter suppression isn't enough. If the polls show Obama in a constant lead over McCain, and then McCain wins the election, voters won't buy it. There will be mass protests and calls for recounts and lawsuits filed to hold off certifying the vote.
The Republican's can't just steal the election. They've got to give the appearance that it was a hard-fought, close contest, and their candidate won.
The mud-slinging, the lies, and the Republican rumor mill that gave us such great hits as, "Obama is a secret Muslim," and "Obama refuses to recite the pledge of allegiance," aim to take off some undecided and easily gullible voters. And Palin, of course, looking to swipe some of the women voters. But that won't be enough to give them the win. They still need to resort to thier bordering-on-illegal tactics.
Source:
- My mind
Oh, and just to scare you.. I thought this was a scary scenario if we shoot the tube and end up in an electoral tie!!
Manipulating Polls
While this isn't blatantly Republican/McCain, this is pretty obviously a secret motive for either corporate gain for Gallup, or for boosting McCain's positives. It seems that Gallup is being pretty loose in choosing which information to use in representing their polling results. The gist: after the Republican convention, Gallup used a slice of polled voters known as "likely voters," (which leans Republican because it reduces the number of young and minority voters), to paint the picture that McCain had a huge upswing in support after his convention. In reality, the poll just had a shift towards more Republican respondants.
"This was a deliberate choice by Gallup and USA Today -- to release a poll that would maximize the impression of McCain's bounce and help shape the campaign narrative in favor of McCain-Palin's favor."
"This was a deliberate choice by Gallup and USA Today -- to release a poll that would maximize the impression of McCain's bounce and help shape the campaign narrative in favor of McCain-Palin's favor."
McCain Push-Polling
McCain campaign targets Jews with misleading claims that anti-Jewish, terrorist organizations support Barack Obama. The smears:
- Obama has had a decade long relationship with pro-Palestinian leaders in Chicago
- the leader of Hamas, Ahmed Yousef, expressed support for Obama and his hope for Obama's victory
- the church Barack Obama has attended is known for its anti-Israel and anti-American remarks
- Jimmy Carter's anti-Israel national security advisor is one of Barack Obama's foreign policy advisors
- Barack Obama was the member of a board (sic) that funded a pro-Palestinian chartiable organization
- Barack Obama called for holding a summit of Muslim nations exlcuding Israel if elected president
Voter Suppression techniques
Looks like the Republicans are at it again. By now they've pretty well gotten their tricks down. In purple states, misleading, mis-addressed, and outright fraudulent mailings are going out to Democratic voters. Looks like these mailings have gone out to at least 1 million voters.
In Michigan, the Obama campaign is suing the Republican party trying to stop these dirty tricks.
In Michigan, the Obama campaign is suing the Republican party trying to stop these dirty tricks.
Monday, September 8, 2008
John McCain is a criminal
I will be posting articles and links to information available detailing the crimes that John McCain and the Republican party is getting away with. I'll cite my link information. Hopefully this will paint a pretty clear picture of the techniques that McCain and his Republican cronies are doing to make this campaign close, and hopefully pull a win out of their bag of dirty tricks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
